Bu bölüm arşiv niteliğindedir. Güncel sitemiz için lütfen tıklayın.

Kılıçdaroğlu her şeyin farkında

BARIŞ YARKADAŞ

Siyasette Stratejik Planlama

ELFİN TATAROĞLU

Adalet suç işlerse!

NURHAN YÖNEZER

Amerika’da olsa... ve Rahman Altın

NECEF UĞURLU

22 Eylül 2014

 

MEDYA

2 Kasım 2011

Bir Mustafa Kemal kalmıştı...

Daha önce Che Guevara için konuşan Nagehan Alçı bu kez de hedef olarak Atatürk'ü seçti.

reklam
CNN TÜRK’te yayınlanan ’Dört Bir Taraf’ programına Nagehan Alçı’nın Atatürk’le ilgili sözleri damga vurdu. Alçı, ’Atatürk savaşı kazandı başarılı oldu ancak bir diktatördü’ dedi.

Alçı’nın bu sözleri izleyicilerden büyük tepki çekerken Altan Öymen ve Enver Aysever de itiraz etti. Canlı yayında yaşanan tartışmanın uzaması üzerine Nagehan Alçı, "Atatürk’ü eleştirmek suç sayılıyor bu tartışmaya perşembe günü devam ederiz" diyerek tartışmayı kapattı.

Daha önce de Che Guevara’yı hedef almıştı

Akşam yazarı Nagehan Alçı, CNN Türk’teki programında efsane devrimci Che Guevara için "Bu adam bir barbardır, bir yamyamdır. Binlerce insana, muhalifine kendi bizzat hakimlik yaptı, katletti" ifadelerini kullanmıştı.








Lütfen tüm alanları doldurun. Girdiğiniz bilgiler kesinlikle yayınlanmayacak, başka bir amaçla kullanılmayacaktır.








Lütfen tüm alanları doldurun. E-mail adresiniz kesinlikle yayınlanmayacak, başka bir amaçla kullanılmayacaktır.

NEJLAN YILDIZ
14 Kasım 2011 15:53

Onlar ne derse desin, onlar 3-5 gazete okuyarak, neo conların veya o-bu partinin veya cemaatin öğrettikleri ile ATATAÜRK'ü değerlendiremezler. Atatürk'ü değerlendirmek için akıl, bilgi,birikim üstün zeka ve eğitim gerek.Atatürk 20 yy dehasıdır.Atatürk onurdur,vatandır,namustur,özgürlüktür.
Onlar bu sığ düşüncelerini yazdıkça söyledikçe ATATÜRK BÜYÜYOR,BÜYÜYOR,BÜYÜYOR.Düşmanları bile önünde saygıyla eğilmiş.Atatürk yeryüzüne 20.yy gelmiş son TRUVALIDIR.

Çalıkuşu
14 Kasım 2011 15:33

Hepimizin iyi derecede İngilizce bilmesi mümkün değil.

Mademki bu yabancı dilli yazı yorumlanmaya değer bulundu, tercüme edilip gönderilse idi de anlasaydık.

denizhan
14 Kasım 2011 15:13

There has been a debate about Ataturk and some people has been claiming that he is a dictator since he is the leader of new secular democratic Turkey and I see that the debate is also going on here in this blog. I was saying "ooh what the hell let people think the way they want to think". But I couln't stop the strong desire to talk about this issue and make clear what is not known well especially by foreign people. Because I felt responsible. As a Turkish citizen I thought that I should at least share what I know with people.I am not writing this comment because I am Turkish and to curse those people who are misinterpreting Atatürk and saying bad things about him. Though I have to admit that I felt a bit sad when I read negative comments about Atatürk because in all honestly it is clear that after he has spent his life for the people of his society and moreover dedicated himself to the world piece he couldn't make people understand what he has fought for. But still it's okay, it's good to have people with different thoughts and aspects. I've been studying Turkish History for a long while so I just hope that you believe I am trying to be objective with the issue. It would be wrong to claim that Atatürk was perfect. First of all he was a normal humanbeing but just with a much more different and special character and a brain. Yes I can say that he was a genious, a great mind and a brain. But that wasn't just it. He was ambitious, determined and had a great sense of responsibility about the things he cared about. And he was sensitive about what was going on around his enviroment moreover around the whole world. He was caring about people. We all feel sad and want to do something when we see a child hurt or lets think about something bigger if anyone asks us we probably say that we want to end the wars don't we. But ne never take action because we're all in our comfort zones and live happily ever after if nothing bad happenes bad to us. We don't have the power, the sense of responsibility and desire to take action but Ataturk did have all of these qualities. Life is much more easier for us today we can end our days and go our comfortable beds and have a good night sleep. I am not trying to underestimate the problems people are having today but comparing to those situations its much more better. Just leave eveything aside Mustafa Kemal Ataturk lost his father when he was just a little boy. If any of you have experienced that I think you know how hard it could be. And I know that he would like to have a warm bed to sleep in at nights at those times and also the whole of his life. People suffer the most understand better what it is like to get hurt physically or emotionally and they care more. He didn't have a car that his father gave him or fancy clothes which he wore at parties because he was at the military school at those ages and were reading poems and articals every single day to understand the state's situation better. Well did he have to do that? Of course not. He was a bright student and more handsome than anybody I know so he could just live his on life and have reputation and lots of money. But he choosed the other way because he cared he worked hard to do something. Now I am going to put Ataturk's character aside and try to explain how he legitimately achieve the process of the independence and revolutions. First of all he was a soldier a commander at the beginning of his movement and he always paid attention to the relationship between himself and the İstanbul state and the sultan because he knew that he had to be legitimate but after a while he had to resign his commission because Istanbul and the state was under military occupation by the Allies. It was clear that the riddance couldn't come from Istanbul government anymore so as a civilian he begin to organize the Anatolians to win their independence back. Here there is something really important: he always emphasized the importance of the national assembly and made all the decisions with the assembly. This is very important because a dictator never gives importance to public opinion and public's power. There are some exceptions where Ataturk had to take the control over and today some people believe that those situations are showing the world that he was a dictator. One exception is he had the authority of being the supreme command(it means that every word he says is being considered as a law) But it was during the indepence war and it was a state of emergency. If you still insist that it is not appropriate than I have to say that the authority was given him by the national assembly and it was just for 5 months. The story can keep going on and on but I don't want to seem grumpy and priggish like I am just here to defend Ataturk like an ignorant person. I am sure that he had made many mistakes but any of them is good enough for us to label him as a dictator. When people asked him if he was a dictator he answered: I did my best just for my country I haven't done anything for myself. I am underlining the word "myself" because a dictator does everything just for himself! Before I finish I'd like to tell you something. In 1932, in Chalet of Marmara, Atatürk was having a tea party for teachers. And that day a teacher asked Ataturk if he was a dictator. And Atatürk answered him just like this(I just admire the way he answered this question): If I were a dictator you couldn't even ask me this question.Please eveyone before judging something at least know what the reality is.If you still don't like it yeah absolutely go for it and judge! But I don't believe that it's a strong argument to claim that Ataturk wasn't that important,wasn't that smart or what he has done for Turkey is not a big deal. I can assure you even I as a student can come up with millions of antithesis against yours and invalidate your argument. Forgive me if I've been too rude or maybe subjective or I don't know what ever.. I don't have a bad intention. I just couldn't stop myself after reading these comments and I spent almost half an hour in front of my computer just to help you look from a different aspect. It is easy to swear or curse people who are not saying good things about a person's national leader but I choosed the hard way and try to explain the truth, the reality as much as I could. Thanks for your time.

NE MUTLU TÜRKÜM DİYENE
4 Kasım 2011 01:06

KONUŞMASI HAKARET İÇERMEKTE OLAN BU KİŞİYE SAVCILIK GÖZ YUMACAKMI ?
BELLİKİ ARKASI KUVVETLİ VE BİRİLERİ YÖNLENDİRİYOR.TÜRKİYEYİ BÖLMEK İSTEYEN ZİHNİYETİN UZANTISI OLDUĞU BELLİ.ÇÜNKÜ ONLARIN ÖNÜNDEKİ EN BÜYÜK GÜÇ ATATÜRK.BU KADIN VE DERİN İLİŞKİLERİ ARAŞTIRILMALI.

YUNUS EMRE
3 Kasım 2011 00:17

bakıyorum da bu kızımız iyi okullarda okumuş.Acaba ATATÜRK O'na böylesine güzel yaşadığı bir ortam bıraktığı için mi ihanet görüyor.Kaldı ki Atatürk hergün tazeleniyor,büyüyor,özleniyor.AMA ZAVALLI kızımız daha o söz ağzından çıkar çıkmaz bayatladı,köhnedi ve bitti.Kocası da asker kaçağı imiş, askerleri eleştiriyor.Demek ki ATATÜRK böyleleri için vatan yaratmadı.böyleleri için cumhuriyet,özgürlük,bayrak istiklal marşı getirmedi bu ülkeye.ATATÜRK zamanında da böyle gazeteci geçinen,yazar geçinen,yağdanlık ve yalakalar vardı.Ama sonradan hepsi pişman olmuş, Atatürk'ten özür dilemek zorunda kalmışlardır.Özür dilese ne olur ki.. bunları konuşturanlar var!
.

Tüm Yorumlar (63)

MEDYA KATEGORİSİNDEKİ DİĞER HABERLERİMİZ